J&K High Court Seeks Compliance Report on Reuniting Deported Pak-Born Teen with Indian Father

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has directed the Rajouri district administration to submit a compliance report regarding a previous judicial order to reunite a Pakistan-born teenager with his Indian father. The case involves Aasim Sajjad, also known as Fardin Sajjad, who was previously deported following government orders affecting Pakistani citizens in the country.

According to court documents and reported claims, Justice MA Chowdhary had previously issued an order on March 25 concerning the teenager, which was later iterated by Justice Rahul Bharti. The court emphasized human values and rights, comparing the situation to the historical estrangement caused by Partition. The judiciary rejected arguments from the Bureau of Immigration that the teenager's deportation was warranted solely due to a lack of an active visa.

Background and Family Details

• Family Lineage: Aasim Sajjad was born on November 26, 2006, in Pakistan, to Sajjad Ahmed, a government schoolteacher from Rajouri, and the late Shabnum Kouser from Gujranwala, Pakistan.
• Visas and Extension Requests: The boy and his mother initially entered India in October 2007 on a 90-day visa, which was extended until 2013 on marital grounds. Following the death of the boy's mother on June 5, 2013, further extensions were granted until April 20, 2015.
• Citizenship Application: The father reportedly filed subsequent applications for Indian citizenship and visa extensions on compassionate grounds, though the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) stated that the citizenship application status showed as "not received yet" on the Ministry of Home Affairs portal.

Deportation Allegations and Official Stance

• The Father's Allegations: Sajjad Ahmed alleged that on April 29, 2025, police raided his house, removed his son in a van, and deported him via the Wagah border without prior notice or a written deportation order.
• Context of Deportation: The action followed a Union government directive canceling visas for Pakistani nationals and requiring their departure in the wake of the April 22 terrorist attack on tourists in Pahalgam.
• FRRO Objections: The FRRO counsel argued in court that the father had not approached the judiciary with clean hands and that the teenager was legally bound to leave India due to the absence of a valid visa.

The high court has sought the latest status report from the district administration to review compliance with the earlier directives. Further updates can be verified through official high court cause lists and district administrative announcements.

Practical Implications

• Families dealing with cross-border visa complexities must monitor official Ministry of Home Affairs portals for documentation updates.
• Legal outcomes in deportation matters rely heavily on verified visa statuses and official administrative records.
• Observers can follow authenticated court proceedings through the official J&K and Ladakh High Court portal.