Supreme Court Warns Delhi Authorities Not to Push for Harsh Firecracker Ban

The Supreme Court, in a Thursday hearing, clarified that it is not inclined to impose a complete ban on firecrackers in the Delhi‑NCR region. However, the bench cautioned that authorities must not push the court to take a “very harsh stand” by failing to enforce its orders on the ground.

A bench comprising Justices MM Sundresh and Prasanna B. Varale emphasized that repeated judicial directions would be ineffective unless the government ensures compliance. The court highlighted that air pollution affects “every living being” and that the matter is not adversarial but requires serious action and cooperation from all stakeholders.

The bench urged that officers be present on the ground to monitor implementation and suggested involving prominent personalities, including sportspersons, to raise public awareness about the harmful effects of firecrackers.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati outlined measures taken by the Delhi government and the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM). The government has drafted an extensive plan to tackle the pollution season, with measures set to take effect from November. These include curbs on older vehicles, restrictions on construction and demolition activities, and staggered office timings.

The Centre informed the court that internal consultations on the use of barium in firecrackers are still underway. Bhati requested a three‑week period to complete the process, after which the bench will reconsider the issue.

The Supreme Court is hearing two petitions: a suo motu case on air pollution in the National Capital Region covering firecrackers, stubble burning, and solid waste management, and another petition seeking a ban on the manufacture of firecrackers.

The court’s stance signals that while a blanket ban is unlikely, strict enforcement of existing orders is essential to curb pollution during the festive season.