Madras High Court Seeks Response on PIL Seeking Action Against CJP Spokesperson Saurav Das

Court Proceedings Initiated

The Madras High Court has issued notices to the Union government, X Corp, and Meta Platforms Inc following a public interest litigation (PIL) filed against Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) spokesperson Saurav Das. The petition, filed by Kancheepuram-based businessman R. Ganesh Kumar, calls for various regulatory and legal measures against Das and his family.

According to the court documents, the first bench comprising Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan admitted the plea and directed the concerned central ministries, social media platforms, Das, and his family members to submit their responses within six weeks.

Key Demands in the Petition

The PIL requests several specific administrative and legal actions, which are currently allegations pending judicial review:

• Investigation: Directing the Union Home Ministry to conduct a detailed probe into the background and lineage of Saurav Das and his family.
• Identity Documents: Seeking the cancellation of Das's passport and Aadhaar card based on petitioner claims regarding his background.
• Social Media Restrictions: Asking the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to block Das's social media handles on platforms like X and Instagram.
• Judiciary Protection: Requesting measures to prevent alleged derogatory statements against the judiciary and Supreme Court judges.

Petitioner Allegations

The petitioner alleged that Das utilized his social media presence to generate public discontent and targeted the judiciary and the ruling establishment. The filing also questioned the association between various public figures, including Abhijith Dipke, Saurav Das, and Neha Bora, urging authorities to investigate their backgrounds and affiliations.

How to Verify

As this is an ongoing legal matter, interested individuals can verify court proceedings through the official Madras High Court case status portal using the relevant writ petition filing details. Official policy actions regarding social media account restrictions or passport reviews depend strictly on formal directives issued by competent authorities and judicial rulings, rather than petition filings alone.